|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Italian Wedding
Soup Of The Day
|
Posted - 2007.10.24 11:24:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Italian Wedding on 24/10/2007 11:24:54
Originally by: Pilk
Originally by: Miner Nine
Originally by: Pilk
Originally by: Obidios People saying the bet was won because of downtime are ******s. Even if IAAAAC put towers on every moon and killed all of BOB's it would still be our station today.
This is the most important quote to those railing about unplanned DT's. On the date of the completion of the bet, BoB would have held the station regardless of any RSF/IAAAC actions short of a spy offlining the BoB towers. Any discussion of the DT is therefore moot.
Prove it. Cause honestly, just saying something is true doesn't make it true.
Okay. On the day I posted this, BoB had sov in the system. Sov only changes at DT. Therefore, BoB could not NOT hold the station on the 21st, regardless of anything RSF/IAAAC did.
Does that explanation constitute sufficient proof?
Originally by: Miner Nine Also, if this was true. You have no e-honour! You take a bet and abusing someone lack of knowledge to make a profit for yourself?!
WHAT? I made this bet over a month ago.
Originally by: Miner Nine Anyways, I would be less of a baby about this myself and go 'Meh, extend it for x amount of days. Furture unplanned downtime won't effect the bet deadline.'
Cause either way, your bet is you believe whoever can continue to hold the system. While others are saying they can take it away in x amount of days. Or do you no longer have faith in your group to continue to hold the system? If that's true, then honestly it's a lose lose. Not only are you taking advantage of someone else and having no e-honour, but you also have no faith in your 'friends'.
Ugh, I've been trolled and shouldn't even be replying to this.
--P
You realize the bet was made to end on the 21st and you posted a day early. If all towers would have been destroyed Sov would have gone neutral on the 20th and then whoever had more towers up would have gotten Sov on the 21st. Way to own yourself.
|

Italian Wedding
Soup Of The Day
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 07:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Pilk I approve of this post.
--P
Can you shut up already, no one really cares. It seems the more you post the less people feel TT needs to pay you. Just shut up. I'd suggest not posting in this thread for a week. signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) |

Italian Wedding
Soup Of The Day
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 07:12:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Nahia Senne
Originally by: Italian Wedding Can you shut up already, no one really cares.
I care. Anyone who needs to decide if they are going to make a bet with TT will care as well.
Let me rephrase this.
No one important cares.
See what I did there? signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) |

Italian Wedding
Soup Of The Day
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 08:49:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jonathan Peterbilt
Originally by: Italian Wedding Edited by: Italian Wedding on 28/10/2007 07:26:21
Originally by: Nahia Senne
Originally by: Italian Wedding Can you shut up already, no one really cares.
I care. Anyone who needs to decide if they are going to make a bet with TT will care as well.
Let me rephrase this.
No one important cares.
See what I did there?
Let me break it down for you. Pilk made a thread about allegedly winning a bet and insulting TT a day before the bet would have actually been won. It's not even clear if the bet should be void or not.
People are saying TT should have said if there was an extended downtime that made it otherwise impossible to do the bet should be void. Did anyone see Pilk say that no matter what even if the servers did go down that the bet should still be honored? No.
People are using double standards.
He then continues to insult TT on nearly every page of this thread talking about e-honor and all that crap. I am not surprised TT hasn't payed, and I wouldn't be surprised it TT didn't pay. I wouldn't pay either.
Post with your main Goon  I hope you understand you cant hide behinde an alt using the same language as your main characters.
Hey I got an idea lets attack the person instead of what was said since we can't come up with a good counter argume.......OH WAI signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) |

Italian Wedding
Soup Of The Day
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 09:25:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Italian Wedding on 28/10/2007 09:25:55
Originally by: Nahia Senne
Originally by: Italian Wedding Hey I got an idea lets attack the person instead of what was said since we can't come up with a good counter argume.......OH WAI
You're strange one. You write a reply, then spend next 40 minutes writing additions and editing your post. All this happens after people already replied to your post in its original form 
As to why TT refuses to actually pay his debts, can it be possible that hes actually broke?
Um, I am made three edits. Second was some spelling and the other was to switch words around cause it didn't make sense otherwise (after I added the additional text to my original post). Once again, you attack the person instead of creating a counter argument. It seems there is a trend in the way a lot of BoB members post. signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) |
|
|
|